Volume 9 Supplement 1

4th International Conference of cGMP Generators, Effectors and Therapeutic Implications

Open Access

Determination of new phosphorylation sites within natriuretic peptide receptors using mass spectrometric methods

  • Andrea R Yoder1Email author,
  • Matthew D Stone2,
  • Tim Griffin2 and
  • Lincoln R Potter2
BMC Pharmacology20099(Suppl 1):P75

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-9-S1-P75

Published: 11 August 2009

Background

While it has long been know that phosphorylation of the kinase homology domain is a key regulatory mechanism of natriuretic peptide receptors, no biochemical proof for individual phosphorylation sites has been reported. Here, we describe biochemical verification of previously identified phosphorylation sites in both natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPR-A) and natriuretic peptide receptor B (NPR-B) as well as the identification of novel phosphorylation sites in both receptors.

Methods and results

Natriuretic peptide receptors were immunoprecipitated and separated by gel electrophoresis. Isolated receptors were digested in the gel by tryptic digestion and individual phosphopeptides were detected with a LTQ-Orbitrap XL hybrid Fourier transform mass spectrometer. Tandem mass spectrometry of the tryptic peptide mixture revealed phosphorylation at all of the previously identified phosphorylation sites within NPR-A and NPR-B. Evidence of additional uncharacterized phosphorylation sites was also obtained. Functional consequences of these individual phosphorylation sites were determined through the use of alanine and glutamate point mutations, which mimic the dephosphorylated and phosphorylated receptor, respectively.

Conclusion

Using mass spectrometric techniques, we have successfully verified known natriuretic peptide receptor phosphorylation sites as well as identified additional novel phosphorylation sites. Possible functional consequences of these putative sites on receptor activation as determined by alanine and glutamate substitutions will be discussed.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota
(2)
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota

Copyright

© Yoder et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement