Skip to main content

Table 1 Binding affinity, potency, and intrinsic activity of opioid ligands in inhibiting adenylyl cyclase activity.

From: Pharmacological profiles of opioid ligands at Kappa opioid receptors

Ligands

EC50 ± SEM (nM)

% Max Inhibition (Mean +/- SEM)

Relative Intrinsic activity

HEK-κ Ki (nM)

Butorphanol

57 ± 47

33 ± 7

0.57

2.5 ± 0.8

Cyclazocine

2 ± 2

39 ± 5

0.67

0.1 ± 0.0

Dezocine

Antagonist

---------

Antagonist

24.5 ± 1.5

Etorphine

0.4 ± 0.3

52 ± 4

0.90

ND

Fentanyl

1677 ± 917

58 ± 9

1.00

233 ± 33

Hydromorphone

279 ± 135

55 ± 6

0.95

55 ± 17

Lofentanil

153 ± 76

58 ± 6

1.00

8.2 ± 1.9

Metazocine

56 ± 13

47 ± 5

0.81

24 ± 7.5

Morphine

213 ± 137

55 ± 5

0.95

26 ± 3

Nalbuphine

2550 ± 1759

27 ± 7

0.47 *

6 ± 1

Nalorphine

483 ± 245

55 ± 7

0.95

1.6 ± 0.1

Naltrexone

Antagonist

--------

Antagonist

0.3 ± 0.1

SKF 10047

24 ± 6

38 ± 4

0.66

0.4 ± 0.2

Win 44441

Antagonist

--------

Antagonist

0.5 ± 0.2

Xorphanol

3.3 ± 2

49 ± 4

0.84

0.4 ± 0.2

  1. Effective concentrations of opioid ligands in inhibiting forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity were measured as described under "Materials and Methods". Data for EC50's represent the mean ± SEM obtained from two or more experiments carried out in duplicate. Maximum inhibition data represent the mean ± SEM obtained from the best fit curve for data from two or more experiments carried out in duplicate. All compounds denoted as antagonists completely reversed the effect of 1 nM etorphine. The effect of 1 nM etorphine in inhibiting cAMP production was 50–60% of maximum etorphine effect. Lofentanil and fentanyl had the highest intrinsic activity among the ligands tested. Relative intrinsic activity of the ligands were also compared to that of the putative endogenous ligand for κ-opioid receptor, dynorphin (EC50 = 8 ± 2 nM, intrinsic activity = 52 ± 3%). All three ligands, lofentanil, fentanyl and dynorphin had similar intrinsic activity. The intrinsic activity of each ligand relative to fentanyl (designated as 1) and the endogenous ligand dynorphin was determined. Statistical significance was calculated for the inhibitory effect of each ligand in comparison to fentanyl and dynorphin. (*). Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) relative to fentanyl or dynorphin suggested that the test ligand was a partial agonist compared to both reference ligands. The binding affinity of each ligand was measured by competition assays. The Ki for each ligand in denoted in the table.
  2. ND = Not determined
  3. * = p < 0.05