Skip to main content
Figure 1 | BMC Pharmacology

Figure 1

From: Extrinsic factors regulate partial agonist efficacy of strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors

Figure 1

Glycine receptors expressed show expression-system dependent agonist pharmacology. (A) Glycine has a reduced potency in L-cells compared to HEK cells. Glycine current responses were plotted versus the log concentration of glycine and normalized to a maximal concentration of glycine (3–10 mM). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; 4 ≤ n ≤ 9 cells for each concentration. Concentration response relationships for GlyRα2 (□; EC50 = 221 μM) and GlyRα2β (; 269 μM) in HEK cells and in L-cells (GlyRα2, ■, 446 μM; GlyRα2β, ; 667 μM) were derived from logistic equation fits to individual cells. (B) β-alanine has both reduced apparent affinity and efficacy for most glycine receptor isoforms transiently expressed in L-cells compared to HEK 293 cells. β-alanine apparent potency in HEK 293 cells was 717 μM for GlyRα2 (□, n = 6) and 560 μM for GlyRα2β (, n = 7). For L-cells, β-alanine potency for GlyRα2 (■, n = 5–8) was 1.61 mM and 1.79 mM for GlyRα2β (, n = 7). Current responses were normalized to a maximal concentration of glycine (10 mM). Note the reduced apparent efficacy of α2β receptors compared to the α2 homomeric isoforms. (C) Taurine has both reduced apparent affinity and efficacy to GlyRs transiently expressed in L-cells compared to HEK 293 cells. Taurine concentration-response relationship in HEK 293 for GlyRα2 (□; 442 μM, n = 5–6) and GlyRα2β (; 1.25 mM, n = 3–5). Taurine concentration-response relationship in L-cells yielded GlyRα2 (■, n = 4) and GlyRα2β (, n = 7) potencies estimated at ≥ 3 mM. Current responses were plotted versus the log concentration of taurine and normalized to a maximal concentration of glycine.

Back to article page